A federal judge is currently presiding over a trial in San Francisco regarding President Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles. This deployment occurred in June during protests against immigration raids. The court is examining whether this action violated federal law.

On the second day of the trial, legal arguments were presented concerning the legality of the President's decision. The case has drawn significant attention as it addresses the intersection of federal authority and state rights, particularly in the context of civil unrest.

The deployment of the National Guard was intended to maintain order during a time of heightened tensions. However, critics argue that it was an overreach of presidential power. They contend that the use of military forces in domestic situations should be carefully scrutinized to prevent potential abuses.

Supporters of the deployment assert that it was necessary to ensure public safety amid the protests. They argue that the National Guard played a crucial role in preventing violence and maintaining peace during a volatile period.

As the trial progresses, both sides are expected to present further evidence and witness testimonies. The outcome could have significant implications for the future use of the National Guard in similar situations.