BNSF Railway Co. slammed the proposed mega-merger between two key rivals as benefitting shareholders at the expense of customers, marking some of the most direct criticism of a deal drawing scrutiny from lawmakers and across the industry.
The $72 billion combination of Union Pacific Corp. and Norfolk Southern Corp. doesn’t propose adding new capacity to the network and won’t create fresh investment, said Zak Anderson, chief of staff and a vice president at BNSF. The North American rail industry is already concentrated heavily among just a handful of companies, raising additional questions over competition, he said.
“This a straight Wall Street transaction,” Anderson said in an interview.
“Union Pacific is disappointed that BNSF as part of the Berkshire Hathaway family, which is publicly

 The Columbian Business
 The Columbian Business

 Raw Story
 Raw Story Reuters US Politics
 Reuters US Politics Local News in Massachusetts
 Local News in Massachusetts AlterNet
 AlterNet The Babylon Bee
 The Babylon Bee NBC Bay Area Entertainment
 NBC Bay Area Entertainment