President Donald Trump announced on Friday that he will revoke all Executive Orders signed by his predecessor, Joe Biden, using an autopen. This decision has sparked discussions about the implications of electronically signed documents in the White House. Trump has criticized Biden's reliance on autopen signatures, despite the fact that many presidents, including Trump himself, have used this method for signing documents. Historically, autopens have been employed for routine signatures, with George W. Bush notably avoiding their use for official purposes. Barack Obama was the first president to utilize an autopen for signing legislation, including pardons and commutations while on vacation. Trump claims he has only used the autopen for less significant documents. The controversy surrounding Biden's autopen signatures raises questions about the validity of these documents. Reports have suggested that Biden's inner circle, including First Lady Jill Biden, engaged in efforts to limit his public appearances and shield him from scrutiny during his presidency. This has led to speculation about the extent of Biden's mental and physical capabilities while in office. One of the most notable documents signed by Biden by hand was a pardon for his son, Hunter Biden, in December of last year. This pardon came amid Republican-led investigations into various financial matters involving the Biden family, which President Biden has consistently described as politically motivated. Hunter Biden faced serious legal challenges, including federal gun and tax offenses, which could have resulted in a public trial and potential jail time. The situation surrounding Biden's presidency is complex, with critics questioning who authorized the use of autopen signatures and whether decisions were made on his behalf. Trump's campaign has seized on this narrative, suggesting that the electronic signatures are part of a broader conspiracy to obscure Biden's condition. As the debate continues, the implications of Biden's use of autopen signatures and the legitimacy of his executive actions remain a focal point of contention. Critics are demanding clarity on the decision-making processes within the Biden administration and the potential consequences of these electronically signed documents.