As candidates and political parties gear up for the 2026 midterm election campaign, the Supreme Court on Tuesday will consider whether long-standing legal limits on coordinated spending -- enacted to prevent corruption -- violate the First Amendment. The case was brought by Republican senatorial and congressional campaign committees along with then-Sen. JD Vance and former Rep. Steve Chabot, both Ohio Republicans, against the Federal Election Commission, which is tasked with enforcing the rules. The coalition seeks to eliminate limits on the ability of parties, which often have a fundraising advantage over individual candidates, to more freely and directly finance TV ads and organizing efforts of candidates they favor. The practice is known as coordinated spending. Oral arguments will take
Supreme Court hears major challenge to campaign spending limits
ABC News1 hrs ago
93


Reuters US Politics
Roll Call
Associated Press Elections
Raw Story
Florida Politics
KCCI 8 Politics
CNN Politics
National Public Radio
AlterNet
The Daily Beast
Cruise Industry News