I’m starting to wonder when our government's checks and balances will kick in – or if they will at all.

On Monday, Aug. 11, President Donald Trump announced he would be deploying the National Guard in Washington, DC, and taking over the city’s police force "to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.” The troops began showing up on Tuesday evening.

According to Trump, violent crime is up in the nation’s capital, and he’s the only one who can rescue the city from societal collapse. It’s a convenient narrative, one that feeds into MAGA’s perception of him. For the rest of us, it’s a terrifying move that shows he is willing to test the limits of presidential oversight.

But while Trump’s hostile takeover of DC public safety is concerning on its own, it’s more alarming that Republicans in Congress are letting him do this with seemingly no regard for what is ethical.

Even if this deployment is legal, there are certain lines that presidents should not cross. This is one of them. And I have to ask. Would Republicans be sitting on their hands if a Democratic president were doing everything that Trump is doing? I would hope not, but here we are.

Of course, Trump is lying about crime in DC

Trump seems to have called in the military after an assault on a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer on Aug. 3. While it’s horrible that a government employee was attacked, Trump’s declaration that Washington is crime-infested and dangerous doesn’t align with reality.

According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime is down 26% compared with last year. In fact, 2024 marked a 30-year low for violent crime in Washington, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Per a New York Times analysis, the homicide rate in 2023 was 40.4 per 100,000 people, the highest rate in 20 years. But that rate declined in 2024, down to 26.6 per 100,000 people. And homicides in the city continue to decline in 2025. While Trump is correct in saying this rate is higher than those of Mexico City and Bogotá, Colombia, it doesn't paint the full picture. A federal takeover is an extreme reaction.

It doesn’t matter, of course, that violent crime in the city is down overall this year. That wouldn’t fit in with the Trumpian narrative, the one where he’s the hero saving tourists and locals alike from violent crime.

Who even asked for this? It wasn't DC Mayor Muriel Bowser.

All of this is happening to the dismay of Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who noted on the Aug. 12 edition of “The Breakfast Club” that the militarization of the city will instill fear in its residents.

“(Trump) wants to send the message to cities that if he can get away with this in Los Angeles, if he can get away with this in DC, he can get away with it in New York, or Baltimore or Chicago, or any other place where millions of people live, work and are doing everything the right way,” Bowser said on the radio show.

Bowser is right, this is an escalation. It’s Trump’s way of showing everyone in Democratic parts of the country that he has the final say and that he isn’t afraid to use the military to his advantage.

Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for anything?

For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about Trump’s invasion of an American city. In fact, it seems that many are supportive of the move.

If a Democratic president were to try to do this, the Republican Party would decry authoritarianism’s arrival in the United States. But because it’s Trump, there has been zero pushback.

Just like his tariff plan that's costing everyday Americans, the failed Elon Musk overhaul of the federal government, the deployment of soldiers against citizens in Los Angeles and his ruthless immigration agenda that includes trying to erase due process, the GOP is letting him get away with all of it.

Republicans may even be happy about it. Imagine if Joe Biden did any of that? The Republican pearl-clutching would be generational. But this is fine because it's their king.

Trump is considering extending the troop deployment beyond 30 days, something he will need congressional approval for. This seems entirely plausible, even likely, because of the Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress.

I’m hesitant to throw the F-word – fascism – around, but if the Trump administration continues down this path, I worry that the rights we have as Americans will slip away. Who’s stopping the president from deploying troops to other cities in the United States? It certainly isn’t going to be Congress. There’s some hope for the Supreme Court, but it has a 6-3 conservative majority.

All of this is happening within the first year of Trump’s return to the White House. There’s no telling what the next three years will bring if this is how he’s starting out. There should be firm lines that presidents do not cross – there are some things that are not appropriate or reasonable for a president to do. Yet that line keeps getting moved by Republicans, who don’t seem to care as long as their conservative agenda is being implemented.

Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants | Opinion

Reporting by Sara Pequeño, USA TODAY / USA TODAY

USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect