In June of 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court found that Harvard University had so egregiously violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits discrimination based on race, that its admissions criteria were ruled unconstitutional.

Less than six hours later, Claudine Gay, then-president of Harvard University, insisted that racial preferences in admissions were “essential to who we are.”

The usurpation of academic worth in favor of sexual orientation, gender identity and race at Harvard was nothing new.

In 2006, university president Larry Summers was fired after suggesting that innate differences in aptitude, rather than discrimination, might explain the underrepresentation of women in science.

While a culture of racial diversity and affirmative action became celebr

See Full Page