Peter Murphy [Aug. 31 op-ed on net-zero policy] is right about AI demanding massive new power generation, but when he resorts to name-calling to minimize the seriousness of climate change , he displays the weakness of his position. Where is his evidence that a net-zero carbon goal “always was a farcical unscientific dogma designed to increase government control over the economy with ever-diminishing freedom for individuals”?
CT senator sounds alarm on new AI use: hiking prices based on your private information
The rapidly decreasing cost of solar power is already rivaling fossil fuel. And what does Peter Murphy think individuals will do if climate change continues unchecked, even past important tipping points?
Talk about doomsday! Renewables may help head off that day.
Patricia B.