Former CJI DY Chandrachud clarified that the Ayodhya verdict was delivered on legal principles and evidence, not faith. Speaking at a Mumbai conclave, he said parts of his remarks on Babri Masjid were taken out of context and stressed that critics often judge the 1,045 page judgement without reading it fully.

Putting light on his judgement that changed the political and sentimental structure of India, former CJI DY Chandrachud says that the Ayodhya case was decided not on the basis of faith but on evidence and legal principles.

Former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud also clarified that his remarks that "erection of the Babri Masjid was a fundamental act of desecration," given to a media portal, have been taken out of context. He further highlighted that the wrong interpretation o

See Full Page