**Critique of Monarchy Highlights Issues in Australian Democracy** The tradition of mocking the royal family has deep roots, from medieval jesters to modern comedians. This ongoing satire underscores the absurdity of a monarchy, where leadership is inherited rather than earned. Comedian John Oliver humorously describes the British royal family as “an emotionally stunted group of fundamentally flawed people doing a very silly pseudo-job.” In Australia, the monarchy is often seen as a relic of colonialism. Comedian Sammy J captures this sentiment in his song "Royal Lullaby," which reflects on the absurdity of a colony being subject to royal whims. The monarchy's presence in Australia raises questions about the legitimacy of its authority, which is often maintained through elaborate ceremonies and public relations efforts. Critics argue that the monarchy reinforces class hierarchies and stifles progress. The expectation to show deference to royal figures can frame dissent as disrespect. This dynamic has historical roots, as seen in instances where political leaders have avoided necessary reforms to maintain royal favor. For example, in 1930, Prime Minister James Scullin faced challenges in appointing a governor-general without offending King George V. Recent events have continued this trend. In 2024, concerns about disrespecting King Charles’ health were cited as reasons to avoid criticism of the monarchy's role in Australia. Critics have also pointed to the reluctance to release the "Palace Letters"—correspondence between the Queen and former Governor-General Sir John Kerr—arguing that this secrecy undermines democratic accountability. Professor Anne Twomey has stated that defining these letters as personal is nonsensical, warning that withholding them risks creating an oppressive secrecy. The historical context is significant; in 1975, Kerr's correspondence with the monarchy was conducted in secret, raising questions about the influence of royal relationships on Australian governance. The monarchy's pomp and ceremony often distract from serious issues within the political system. The recent secret appointments made by Governor-General David Hurley, which were not disclosed to the public or even to the ministers involved, highlight a troubling lack of transparency. Critics argue that such actions indicate a broken democracy, where power can be wielded without accountability. The Australian Constitution's vague language regarding the monarchy and democracy leaves room for exploitation. The term "monarch's pleasure" appears frequently, while the concept of democracy is notably absent. This lack of clarity can lead to abuses of power, as seen in the historical Dismissal of the Whitlam government, which remains shrouded in secrecy. The ongoing debate about the monarchy's role in Australia reflects broader issues of civic knowledge and engagement. The normalization of hierarchical structures can hinder equitable distribution of power and knowledge. As discussions about a potential republic and other reforms continue, many argue that the current system is in dire need of reevaluation. This critique of the monarchy serves as a reminder of the complexities of Australian identity and governance, urging a reconsideration of the relationship between the monarchy and democracy in the country.