WASHINGTON — In a landmark decision announced this week, the Supreme Court ruled that a Pennsylvania public restroom installer had acted with criminal intent against males who want to relieve themselves with adequate protection from chatty, curious neighbors. While the 6-3 decision solidified several guidelines for public restrooms, the nation's highest court earned the most accolades for declaring urinals without dividers to be unconstitutional.

"This judicial body finds the use of adjacent urinals without dividers of at least 15 inches to be in violation of the constitution's right to private privacy." Justice Clarence Thomas gave the majority opinion. "Public restrooms are already public enough as it is – the constitution protects an inviolable right. Men should be able to keep their

See Full Page