The Supreme Court is hearing a significant case that could reshape the landscape of copyright law and internet service provider (ISP) liability. The case centers on whether ISPs can be held financially responsible for copyright violations committed by their users. Cox Communications, the third-largest broadband provider in the United States, is at the center of this billion-dollar legal battle. The company faces a $1 billion judgment awarded to Sony Music Entertainment and other music industry plaintiffs, who argue that Cox failed to act against users known for repeated copyright infringement. The coalition of music labels claims that Cox ignored numerous notices regarding specific IP addresses linked to copyright violations. They argue that the company’s inaction in terminating access for these users constitutes complicity in the infringement. Cox has countered that it should not be held liable for the actions of its customers. The company maintains that it does not encourage copyright infringement and that its terms of service explicitly prohibit illegal activities. Cox asserts that less than 1% of its users engage in copyright violations and that its internal measures have successfully addressed 95% of those cases. The legal arguments also highlight Cox's 13-strike policy, which allows for potential termination of service based on the number of complaints received about a user. Critics argue that this policy is insufficient and that Cox has deliberately chosen profit over compliance with copyright laws. In a legal brief, attorneys for the music coalition stated, "Cox made a deliberate and egregious decision to elevate its own profits over compliance with the law," emphasizing that the company provided the means for widespread copyright infringement. Cox's legal team argues that if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's ruling, it could lead to severe consequences, including the termination of internet access for entire households, businesses, and institutions based on mere allegations of infringement. The case has drawn attention due to the broader implications for ISPs and the entertainment industry. The justices will hear oral arguments and are expected to issue a decision by the end of June 2026. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for how copyright law is enforced in the age of the internet, impacting millions of users and the future of online content distribution.