Synopsis: Revanna had raised concerns that the trial judge was likely to be biased against him since the same judge had earlier convicted him in another rape case. Senior Advocates Siddharth Luthra and Siddarth Dave, who were appearing for Revanna, argued that that the judge made adverse comments against the lawyers too.

Supreme Court on Thursday, 11 December, rejected a plea filed by former JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna to transfer his trial in two pending rape cases from a Special MP/MLA Court at Bengaluru to some other court.

Revanna had raised concerns that the trial judge was likely to be biased against him since the same judge had earlier convicted him in another rape case. Senior Advocates Siddharth Luthra and Siddarth Dave, who were appearing for Revanna, argued that that the judge m

See Full Page