Synopsis: The Bench repeatedly sought factual clarity, questioning whether the disputed pillar was ever verified as a lamp pillar and asking whether the temple administration had the authority to shift the lamp-lighting spot. The judges also asked why a lamp visible to all devotees should not be allowed if that was the petitioner’s concern. They noted that the dispute had existed in various forms since the 1920s and said a permanent, practical solution was overdue, remarking that avoidable ego clashes were worsening the controversy.

The Madras High Court Division Bench of Justices Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan on Friday, 12 December, heard the appeals challenging the recent single-judge order permitting the Karthigai Deepam to be lit on the hilltop pillar at Thirupparankundram.

At th

See Full Page