Key points

AI’s fluency can quietly co-author beliefs, blurring the line between support and distortion.

Even with safeguards, chatbots may affirm fragile thinking, fueling techno-psychological pathology.

We need to question what AI says, and why we’re so ready to believe it.

These days I spend much of my time in dialogue. Sometimes with people, with ideas, and perhaps more often than I'd like to admit, with machines. Over the few years, as large language models have moved from novelty to necessity, I’ve found myself observing how others engage and, perhaps more interesting, what emerges at the margins. And along the way, I've become a bit of a digital voyeur, taking notice to curious fragments of conversation, social posts, emails, private messages that have begun to worry me. I’m sug

See Full Page