Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson blasted the Supreme Court’s conservative majority for gutting judicial review to protect the Trump administration’s actions.

According to HuffPost, Jackson issued a scathing dissent in the case “National Institutes of Health v. American Public Health Association,” which centered around whether plaintiffs could challenge the Trump administration’s cancellation of federal health grants under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

The court’s five conservative justices ruled that such challenges must be filed in the Court of Federal Claims as monetary claims, rather than in federal district court under the APA.

Jackson strongly disagreed, calling the ruling a “bizarre claim-splitting regime” that forces plaintiffs on a “likely futile, multivenue quest for com

See Full Page