**Title: Expert Offers Insights on Arctic Development Challenges**

Fen Hampson, a prominent figure in Canadian foreign policy, has shared his insights on the challenges facing Prime Minister Mark Carney's government regarding Arctic development. Hampson, who directs Carleton University’s Norman Paterson School of International Affairs and leads the World Refugee and Migration Council, emphasizes the need for a strategic approach to the ambitious nation-building projects proposed for Canada’s Arctic regions.

The Arctic, which includes Nunavut, Northwest Territories, and Yukon, represents about 40% of Canada’s landmass but contributes only 0.5% to the national GDP. Carney's government is currently evaluating two major projects: the Port of Churchill Plus and the Arctic Economic and Security Corridor. The Port of Churchill Plus aims to enhance the Port of Churchill and its infrastructure, including an all-weather road and upgraded rail line. The Arctic Economic and Security Corridor proposes a land-based infrastructure network connecting the Canadian Prairies to a deepwater port in Nunavut.

Hampson points out that one of Carney's significant challenges is to articulate a compelling reason for these projects. He notes, "Canadians tend to look southwards; they don’t look northwards. Most have never been to the Arctic." He believes that while some initiatives may seem like "prime ministerial pipe dreams," they are crucial for the region's future.

Having spent time in the North himself, Hampson recalls his experience in Rankin Inlet, Nunavut, where he worked on a geophysical survey for a mining company as a teenager. He warns that the current situation in the North mirrors past challenges, such as job losses when mines close. Hampson advises the government to conduct thorough research and understand the business case for these projects to ensure their sustainability.

He questions whether the government plans to lead these initiatives or if it will rely on private sector involvement. Hampson states, "Ottawa — and it’s not just Ottawa, it’s the provinces — need to take a very hard look at what’s the business case here, what kinds of resource development are we talking about."

Hampson also highlights the changing risks in the Arctic, particularly due to Russia's military activities and China's ambitions in the region. He notes that both countries view the Arctic as vital for their security and commerce, investing heavily in infrastructure and resources. He warns that Canada has little strategic depth, as 90% of its population lives within 100 miles of the U.S. border.

On a more positive note, Hampson acknowledges that Ottawa is actively engaging with Nordic countries to enhance cooperation in the Arctic. He believes that the initial projects endorsed by Carney's government are intended to demonstrate capability and build momentum.

Hampson argues that Canada needs a visionary leader to overcome bureaucratic inertia and execute these plans effectively. He cites historical examples like the St. Lawrence Seaway and the TransCanada pipeline as models for successful infrastructure development. He stresses the importance of having someone who can navigate the complexities of government and business relationships.

As the conversation shifts to public engagement, Hampson suggests that Carney may need to communicate more openly with Canadians. He proposes that Carney should consider regular updates to foster a stronger relationship with the public. Hampson concludes that while Canadians trust Carney, he must be transparent about the challenges ahead, stating, "I can’t solve everything for you. And if we’re going to rebuild this country and make our economy resilient, you’re going to have to give up things." This message, he notes, may be difficult for a politician to convey, but it is essential for the future of Canada’s Arctic development.