Key points
Citations measure attention, not research quality or rigor.
Non-replicable studies often get more citations than solid ones.
Prestige and novelty (not methods) drive citation counts.
Transparency metrics like TOP Factor better signal research quality.
I usually write about social connection and loneliness , but every few months I return to research methods. This is one of those moments.
I often see researchers posting celebratory messages on LinkedIn when they reach a citation milestone (e.g., 10,000 citations). Recently, researchers have been posting screenshots of their Clarivate citation counts. I understand the appeal, especially if you work so hard for years. And academia treats these numbers as professional currency. But there is a fundamental problem: The evidence

Psychology Today

Reuters US Top
Insider
Press of Alantic City Business
CBS News
Bozeman Daily Chronicle Sports
Nola Entertainment
OK Magazine