For years, federal policymakers have tweaked lung cancer screening guidelines as if the barrier to saving lives is a math problem. Add a few years to the eligibility age. Drop a few pack-years — a measure combining how much and how long someone has smoked. Remove a quit-time rule. Repeat.

But it was never really a math problem. A new study in JAMA Network Open makes clear what many of us in cancer prevention and control have been warning for over a decade: No amount of technical adjusting will fix a system built on stigma.

I see the effects of this every day. As a behavioral scientist and nurse practitioner, I’ve sat with hundreds of patients confronting the potential of a lung cancer diagnosis. I’ve watched people brace themselves before they say the words “I used to smoke,” even wh

See Full Page