Prime Minister Mark Carney's recent remarks have raised questions about the direction of Canada's foreign policy, particularly regarding its commitment to feminist principles. During a statement on Sunday, Carney acknowledged that while gender equality is a priority, he would not label the foreign policy as a "feminist foreign policy." He stated, "We have that aspect to our foreign policy, but I wouldn’t describe our foreign policy as feminist foreign policy. Those are different points, but related."

Carney emphasized that issues like gender-based violence are fundamentally matters of justice. He noted, "Different countries put a different priority on it. But by discussing strategies and approaches, my experience is that I think that’s part of our policy, as well."

His comments have not been well received by some members of the Liberal Party. MP Karina Gould expressed her concerns, stating, "What it means is that, as Canadians, we expect that we’re gonna stand up for gender equality around the world. There are a lot of people who worked on this policy who care very deeply about it."

Gould was referring to the Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP), established in 2017 under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. This policy aimed to align Canada’s foreign aid with feminist goals, focusing on six pillars, including gender equality, climate action, and peace and security. It sought to increase the number of female peace negotiators and support women’s leadership in climate change initiatives.

Critics argue that by broadening the definition of foreign policy, Trudeau's approach risked diluting its effectiveness. Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper had previously warned against mixing too many priorities, which could lead to inaction. Under Harper, Canada focused on maternal and child health care, pledging $3.5 billion to the cause, which received international praise. However, Harper faced criticism for excluding abortion services from his health initiatives, a point Trudeau later included in FIAP.

Carney's shift in focus may alienate some left-leaning members of the Liberal Party while potentially appealing to Conservative voters. This change comes at a time when Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre faces challenges within his party. Carney's comments also coincide with a recent $70 billion investment deal with the United Arab Emirates, a nation often criticized for its gender equality record. This timing has led to speculation that Carney may be distancing himself from the feminist label to maintain favorable relations with trade partners.

Despite the uncertainty surrounding Carney's intentions, officials like Randeep Sarai, Secretary of State for International Development, have reiterated that Canada continues to apply a feminist lens to its foreign aid, citing economic benefits. Carney's recent budget also included a "gender and diversity" lens in its proposals. Until Carney provides a clearer stance on the future of Canada's foreign policy, the debate over its feminist identity is likely to continue, leaving many to wonder how much will truly change under his leadership.