The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision this summer that could affect how courts and presidents interact for decades to come. The ruling limits the use of nationwide injunctions, a powerful tool lower courts have often used to halt federal policies.
To help explain the decision and its implications, Lashandra Peoples-Johnson from Johnson Cephas Law joined Dave Davis for an interview.
"So the decision is basically that courts need to pretty much stay in their lane. They need to make decisions based on the parties before them and not try to change national policy by issuing these injunctions that affect the whole."
"OK, so pretty much lower courts for a while have been issuing these nationwide injunctions that go beyond their geographical jurisdiction and an injunction is pretty muc