South Korea has long been held up as a model supporter of the global non-proliferation regime, trusting the American “nuclear umbrella” to keep the peace on the peninsula. But the strategic environment around Seoul has changed dramatically. North Korea now boasts a larger, more sophisticated nuclear and missile arsenal. At the same time, confidence in U.S.-extended deterrence has eroded amid American political polarization and doubts about Washington’s willingness to risk its own cities for an ally.
The result is something once unthinkable: a serious national debate over whether South Korea needs its own nuclear weapons. This is no longer a fringe idea. It is a mainstream conversation crossing generational, elite and partisan lines.
But while the question is understandable, the answer st

Defense News

The Daily Beast
AlterNet
Raw Story
Associated Press Top News
CNN
Reuters US Top
America News
Newsweek Top